<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rural “share genius” with only 3 years of schooling becomes a millionaire through stockmarket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/</link>
	<description>A wise one knows moving mountains is beyond human power, but a fool has other thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TonyP4</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46465</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46465</guid>
		<description>My children all do not want to learn my investment skills (some children adore what their parents do but mine are not). Investing in mutual funds is a must to accumulate (or lose) wealth for most at least via their 401K plans in US.

As in life there is no guarantee, but a educated investor makes educated guesses, protects the wealth with various techniques, researches stocks better than most...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My children all do not want to learn my investment skills (some children adore what their parents do but mine are not). Investing in mutual funds is a must to accumulate (or lose) wealth for most at least via their 401K plans in US.</p>
<p>As in life there is no guarantee, but a educated investor makes educated guesses, protects the wealth with various techniques, researches stocks better than most&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huaren</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46457</link>
		<dc:creator>huaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46457</guid>
		<description>Hi TonyP4, #8,
Hi hzzz, #9,

Bottom line - if you guys have a child who has started working, would you stop them from investing in stocks or mutual funds?

Btw, good for you, hzzz on your condo in Shanghai.  I almost ended up buying one few years ago.  My view on China&#039;s real estate is still very bullish, simply because there is not much space and there are tons of people.  If you believe in the long run China will achieve standards of living similar to that of the West, then competition for real estate will be even more fierce.

Well, I think its definitely true for villas.  For condos, I suppose you can build more upwards and the sky is the limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TonyP4, #8,<br />
Hi hzzz, #9,</p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; if you guys have a child who has started working, would you stop them from investing in stocks or mutual funds?</p>
<p>Btw, good for you, hzzz on your condo in Shanghai.  I almost ended up buying one few years ago.  My view on China&#8217;s real estate is still very bullish, simply because there is not much space and there are tons of people.  If you believe in the long run China will achieve standards of living similar to that of the West, then competition for real estate will be even more fierce.</p>
<p>Well, I think its definitely true for villas.  For condos, I suppose you can build more upwards and the sky is the limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hzzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46346</link>
		<dc:creator>hzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46346</guid>
		<description>As someone who invests in the Chinese stock market, one thing people should know about China&#039;s stock market is that it&#039;s almost completely fueled by speculation rather than fundamentals.  In the old days you would see certain stocks shooting up 40-50% a day easily not based on its earning announcements but completely based on rumors.  One of my aunts is a CFO for a mid sized company in China and speaking with her there is no doubt in my mind that insider trading is very rampant, fueling speculation.  I myself have been given multiple what I thought were wild stock advices from people which actually come true.  It&#039;s extremely tempting then to speculate rather than to actually invest based on good logic.  In order to combat this, the Chinese government implemented a policy where stocks would halt if their values are raised above 10% a day.  However, without good transparency laws and a good infrastructure to enforce these laws, investing in China is more about who you know than what you know about companies.

Those who already have good amount of capital invest in real estate rather than stocks.  The properties which I purchased in Shanghai in 2004 have increased by more than 5 times in value if you take into account of currency differences as well.  In fact, the average condo/house price in good areas of Shanghai today is slightly below that of New York City (one of my neighbors recently sold her ~150 sq. meter condo for 6+Million RMB).  A friend of mine who makes about 8k RMB per month bought a home in PuDong 6 years ago and the property values there went up alot more.  While not everyone made off good with stocks in the last few years, just about everyone who invested in real estate in big cities did.  Although I am sure the bubble will burst at some point, if you look at Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Taiwan real estate market you will see that even if they lose 30% of the value they will bounce back in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who invests in the Chinese stock market, one thing people should know about China&#8217;s stock market is that it&#8217;s almost completely fueled by speculation rather than fundamentals.  In the old days you would see certain stocks shooting up 40-50% a day easily not based on its earning announcements but completely based on rumors.  One of my aunts is a CFO for a mid sized company in China and speaking with her there is no doubt in my mind that insider trading is very rampant, fueling speculation.  I myself have been given multiple what I thought were wild stock advices from people which actually come true.  It&#8217;s extremely tempting then to speculate rather than to actually invest based on good logic.  In order to combat this, the Chinese government implemented a policy where stocks would halt if their values are raised above 10% a day.  However, without good transparency laws and a good infrastructure to enforce these laws, investing in China is more about who you know than what you know about companies.</p>
<p>Those who already have good amount of capital invest in real estate rather than stocks.  The properties which I purchased in Shanghai in 2004 have increased by more than 5 times in value if you take into account of currency differences as well.  In fact, the average condo/house price in good areas of Shanghai today is slightly below that of New York City (one of my neighbors recently sold her ~150 sq. meter condo for 6+Million RMB).  A friend of mine who makes about 8k RMB per month bought a home in PuDong 6 years ago and the property values there went up alot more.  While not everyone made off good with stocks in the last few years, just about everyone who invested in real estate in big cities did.  Although I am sure the bubble will burst at some point, if you look at Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Taiwan real estate market you will see that even if they lose 30% of the value they will bounce back in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP4</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46340</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46340</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of those monkeys. However, I can tell you those folks constantly beating the market is not due to luck but a lot of hard work and training. Contrary to the academic assumption, the stock market is not efficient (i.e. the price of the stock is not automatically calculated with all the attributes about a company).

As a stock picker, I do not care about raising money for a company, but making money for myself or the clients for some. I contribute nothing to the society. Hopefully, I try to make money on better judgment than my opponents (every trade there is a buyer and a seller - also known as a winner and a loser).

There are many get rich stories. 
* Friends who made over 1 M profit in 401K up to 4-1, 2000 and lost most after 2000.
* The winner of a stock competition (MSN) happened to be a Chinese and lost big in many trades he recommended.
Many, many more.

Some make good money for a reason.
* Cramer, host to Mad Moeny, must make good money selling books. He also make money by buying before he make his recommendation public.
* Following the insider trade info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those monkeys. However, I can tell you those folks constantly beating the market is not due to luck but a lot of hard work and training. Contrary to the academic assumption, the stock market is not efficient (i.e. the price of the stock is not automatically calculated with all the attributes about a company).</p>
<p>As a stock picker, I do not care about raising money for a company, but making money for myself or the clients for some. I contribute nothing to the society. Hopefully, I try to make money on better judgment than my opponents (every trade there is a buyer and a seller &#8211; also known as a winner and a loser).</p>
<p>There are many get rich stories.<br />
* Friends who made over 1 M profit in 401K up to 4-1, 2000 and lost most after 2000.<br />
* The winner of a stock competition (MSN) happened to be a Chinese and lost big in many trades he recommended.<br />
Many, many more.</p>
<p>Some make good money for a reason.<br />
* Cramer, host to Mad Moeny, must make good money selling books. He also make money by buying before he make his recommendation public.<br />
* Following the insider trade info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huaren</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46317</link>
		<dc:creator>huaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46317</guid>
		<description>Thx, folks, for chiming in.

Colin, #3: &quot;This is literally a case of a million monkeys at typewriters, and one of them coming up with shakespeare.&quot;

That&#039;s a great analogy for day traders.  To me, they don&#039;t add any intrinsic economic value to society - aside from if they earn a lot of money, they pay tax to the government.

But, folks, isn&#039;t the stock market supposed to be a great way for companies to raise capital from the public?  Isn&#039;t this supposed to be a great way for the public to participate in the growth of their economy more than simply being an employee?

In the long run, I think many of these monkeys are going to be able to type Shakespeare though.  Enough monkeys will have to have jumped out the window too, I suppose.

The thing striking for me about this translated story is Xie Xianqing&#039;s qualities.  He is very persistent and resourceful and courageous to go after what he wants.  Also, having lost everything doesn&#039;t stop him.  (Gambling his family&#039;s assets away is irresponsible.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx, folks, for chiming in.</p>
<p>Colin, #3: &#8220;This is literally a case of a million monkeys at typewriters, and one of them coming up with shakespeare.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great analogy for day traders.  To me, they don&#8217;t add any intrinsic economic value to society &#8211; aside from if they earn a lot of money, they pay tax to the government.</p>
<p>But, folks, isn&#8217;t the stock market supposed to be a great way for companies to raise capital from the public?  Isn&#8217;t this supposed to be a great way for the public to participate in the growth of their economy more than simply being an employee?</p>
<p>In the long run, I think many of these monkeys are going to be able to type Shakespeare though.  Enough monkeys will have to have jumped out the window too, I suppose.</p>
<p>The thing striking for me about this translated story is Xie Xianqing&#8217;s qualities.  He is very persistent and resourceful and courageous to go after what he wants.  Also, having lost everything doesn&#8217;t stop him.  (Gambling his family&#8217;s assets away is irresponsible.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOARP</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46307</link>
		<dc:creator>FOARP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46307</guid>
		<description>1) The investor&#039;s story sounds like BS. Even nowadays, 60,000 RMB is a lot of moolah, most expats have a hard time saving that much over a year, forget about the boss at a small company back in 1991 saving it even over several years. What would he have made? If it was more than 5,000 RMB a month I&#039;d be amazed. How does someone go from working in a mine to managing a printing firm? With no real formal education? Once again, this looks like rubbish. Even the details - like carry around 60,000 RMB in a hemp sack - read like complete fabrications.

2) If he&#039;s telling the truth about his investments, then he was incredibly lucky. I&#039;m pretty sure not everybody who subscribed to the Shenzhen Special Zone Report back in 1991 made it rich. 

3) I have to agree with Charlie here. Taiwan was - and to a degree still is - an example of just how over-hyped stockmarket investment can get. My old boss when I first worked in Taiwan would, when no getting thoroughly drunk, spend his time watching the stock market results on the television - he managed to waste a large sum of money through his idiotic investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) The investor&#8217;s story sounds like BS. Even nowadays, 60,000 RMB is a lot of moolah, most expats have a hard time saving that much over a year, forget about the boss at a small company back in 1991 saving it even over several years. What would he have made? If it was more than 5,000 RMB a month I&#8217;d be amazed. How does someone go from working in a mine to managing a printing firm? With no real formal education? Once again, this looks like rubbish. Even the details &#8211; like carry around 60,000 RMB in a hemp sack &#8211; read like complete fabrications.</p>
<p>2) If he&#8217;s telling the truth about his investments, then he was incredibly lucky. I&#8217;m pretty sure not everybody who subscribed to the Shenzhen Special Zone Report back in 1991 made it rich. </p>
<p>3) I have to agree with Charlie here. Taiwan was &#8211; and to a degree still is &#8211; an example of just how over-hyped stockmarket investment can get. My old boss when I first worked in Taiwan would, when no getting thoroughly drunk, spend his time watching the stock market results on the television &#8211; he managed to waste a large sum of money through his idiotic investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP4</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46300</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46300</guid>
		<description>Steve, the difference is: investing other people&#039;s money is 100% risk free and 100% profitable while investing  own money is 100% risky and not always profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, the difference is: investing other people&#8217;s money is 100% risk free and 100% profitable while investing  own money is 100% risky and not always profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46287</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46287</guid>
		<description>@ Colin: I&#039;ve often wondered why I should let a stranger invest my money when if he&#039;s so sharp, why is he working as an investment broker? If he was such a genius, he&#039;d be spending all his time managing his own money and be too wealthy to bother investing my pitiful stake. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Colin: I&#8217;ve often wondered why I should let a stranger invest my money when if he&#8217;s so sharp, why is he working as an investment broker? If he was such a genius, he&#8217;d be spending all his time managing his own money and be too wealthy to bother investing my pitiful stake. <img src='http://blog.foolsmountain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46282</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46282</guid>
		<description>This is literally a case of a million monkeys at typewriters, and one of them coming up with shakespeare.

Studies have proven time and time again that nobody can outperform the market outside of illegal activities (eg bernie madoff, inside traders) or sheer luck (read nassim taleb). And in fact, the financial markets are like casinos in that the odds favor the house, ie the brokers, brokerages, exchange, corporations, government, money managers, hedgies, etc. at the expense of the individual investor.

Stories like these are dangerous in that they give the false impression to would be investors that they can actually win at this game through their sheer intelligence and perseverance, and I fear very many may lose some or all of their wealth from it.

That being said, if you know how the game works, you could take advantage of these these dupes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is literally a case of a million monkeys at typewriters, and one of them coming up with shakespeare.</p>
<p>Studies have proven time and time again that nobody can outperform the market outside of illegal activities (eg bernie madoff, inside traders) or sheer luck (read nassim taleb). And in fact, the financial markets are like casinos in that the odds favor the house, ie the brokers, brokerages, exchange, corporations, government, money managers, hedgies, etc. at the expense of the individual investor.</p>
<p>Stories like these are dangerous in that they give the false impression to would be investors that they can actually win at this game through their sheer intelligence and perseverance, and I fear very many may lose some or all of their wealth from it.</p>
<p>That being said, if you know how the game works, you could take advantage of these these dupes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Liu</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46274</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46274</guid>
		<description>Taiwan in the 80&#039;s is also a good example. When obasans toting groceries drop in to look at tickers, or taxi drivers are talking about their portfolio, it&#039;s time to get out.

Truth be told, even in US stock market is run like a MLM(&quot;mouse club&quot;). It&#039;s a gamble, and the share genius story hopefully is to be heeded, not emulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taiwan in the 80&#8217;s is also a good example. When obasans toting groceries drop in to look at tickers, or taxi drivers are talking about their portfolio, it&#8217;s time to get out.</p>
<p>Truth be told, even in US stock market is run like a MLM(&#8220;mouse club&#8221;). It&#8217;s a gamble, and the share genius story hopefully is to be heeded, not emulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP4</title>
		<link>http://blog.foolsmountain.com/2009/08/25/rural-%e2%80%9cshare-genius%e2%80%9d-with-only-3-years-of-schooling-becomes-a-millionare-through-stockmarket/#comment-46265</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foolsmountain.com/?p=5146#comment-46265</guid>
		<description>Being a investor myself (3 years full time and part time for years), here are my two cents.

* When the market is good like China today, every one is a genius.

* When the market crashes, many will bankrupt. 

* Good investors have been trained and they usually work for mutual funds to handle other people&#039;s money. It is a professional job, and not a job for gamblers.

* The society will be bad at both extremes of the market. Hong Kong is a good example. When every one is busy &#039;making money&#039;, they will forget their regular jobs.

Family lives will be affected adversely by the ups and downs of the market.

* Chinese stock market is the wild, wild west. Insider trading is not enforced and financial data is manipulated. It takes years to clean it up. 

Forget so-and-so making millions. Their gamble pays off this time, but there is no guarantee next time. If you know someone always beating the market by one or two points, stick with this guy. Avoid the guy doubling his money every year as next time he could lose all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a investor myself (3 years full time and part time for years), here are my two cents.</p>
<p>* When the market is good like China today, every one is a genius.</p>
<p>* When the market crashes, many will bankrupt. </p>
<p>* Good investors have been trained and they usually work for mutual funds to handle other people&#8217;s money. It is a professional job, and not a job for gamblers.</p>
<p>* The society will be bad at both extremes of the market. Hong Kong is a good example. When every one is busy &#8216;making money&#8217;, they will forget their regular jobs.</p>
<p>Family lives will be affected adversely by the ups and downs of the market.</p>
<p>* Chinese stock market is the wild, wild west. Insider trading is not enforced and financial data is manipulated. It takes years to clean it up. </p>
<p>Forget so-and-so making millions. Their gamble pays off this time, but there is no guarantee next time. If you know someone always beating the market by one or two points, stick with this guy. Avoid the guy doubling his money every year as next time he could lose all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
