Fool’s Mountain: Blogging for China愚人節山：為中國博客

Alright, I have to concede, after a few days of reflection, that I might have been好吧，我不得不承認，幾天後的反思，我可能已經 a bit too harsh on Sharon Stone有點過於苛刻的莎朗斯通 . 。

Some of the commentators, both on this blog and else where, have suggested/recommended leaving her alone for it was not worth the ink (or the LCD backlight decay) to argue over her remarks.一些評論家認為，雙方在此博客和其他地方，建議/建議讓她獨自為它是不值得的墨水（或LCD背光衰減） ，以爭論的言論。 I see the wisdom of such perspectives now.我看到的智慧，現在這種觀點。 All I really should have done is to stand aside and watch her所有我真的應該做的是站在一旁，看她的 pushing the proverbial high heel and the attached flesh ever deeper down into her throat推高的諺語足跟及所附的肉以往任何時候都更深的進入她的喉嚨 . 。

So Sharon, please keep going.因此，沙龍，請繼續下去。 And would you like a bigger shovel?和你想大鏟？

PS: Could anyone explain to me why Google News, when the term “Sharon Stone” is queried, would return a top ranked link titled “Actress Stone Contrite Over China Comments” whereas the referenced NYT article is actually titled “Actress Stone and Dior Differ Over Apology”?附註：誰能向我解釋為什麼新聞谷歌時，長期“莎朗斯通”查詢，將返回一個排名鏈接名為“女演員石悔罪在中國評論” ，而引用紐約時報的文章實際上是名為“石女演員和迪奧差在道歉“ ？